<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ARQ (2016) Explained	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: brujah1381		</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brujah1381]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomytrek.com/?p=8058#comment-2188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2019&quot;&gt;Daniel&lt;/a&gt;.

Her waking up the way she did indicates that she will remember a previous loop. When she wakes up before she starts to remember it&#039;s subtle, when she starts remembering she wakes up like she&#039;s coming out of a bad dream, that&#039;s the clue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2019">Daniel</a>.</p>
<p>Her waking up the way she did indicates that she will remember a previous loop. When she wakes up before she starts to remember it&#8217;s subtle, when she starts remembering she wakes up like she&#8217;s coming out of a bad dream, that&#8217;s the clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: phantohs		</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2087</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phantohs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomytrek.com/?p=8058#comment-2087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[in the 9th loop could that be an indicator there would be a second movie? if so i cannot wait!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the 9th loop could that be an indicator there would be a second movie? if so i cannot wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Disqus_Sucks		</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2040</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Disqus_Sucks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 08:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomytrek.com/?p=8058#comment-2040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There were limitless, other strip of loop that were recorded to the ARQ(As showed in the movie) and since obviously the one who came up with the idea is so friendly with programming, this could be a thing. Why do they remember certain loops(till 9) seems to because of Cuz(cousin) touching the ARQ changing the co-factor, but the only thing that is consistent is:
1. Loop
2. Crash on the screen,and files, programs, the drive that contains data
3. Radio that bandits were hearing to; precisely, the radio signal that repeats itself(as they talked about why someone hear this repeating, answer was simple but very good reason since it&#039;s a movie about time loop)

So we can think that loop would&#039;ve caused something at least something to the world inside the movie, physically it was the circle and the difference seemed to be:

1. ecosystem inside the circle (the contrast that shows the color difference inside&#038;outside circle, this is important because organisms were also kinda a big key to this movie)
2. memory (it&#039;s all about the variables of memory in this)
3. Behavior as memory changes

As far as I&#039;m concerned, the problem to this is that first of all data is also physically differing as computer records it, and since memory is very fragile and when big changes occur to you your memory can be always shut off, just like that. But the problem is that memory causes change in behavior, and behavioral changes caused them to record the warning message.

So now we know what&#039;s consistent and what&#039;s not.
So far the movie has lots of &#039;organic&#039; differences and physical stuff that does not change. Setting those physical stuff as consistent variable, organic differences are the inconsistent variable that we want to verify.

First flaw to this: Hard drives are not physically same, it&#039;s different
Second: Time speeds up in a linear manner, but their conception doesn&#039;t.

This is because it&#039;s a movie, &#039;conception&#039; is something that it&#039;s hard to adjust or to be shown by film. Also computer is obviously not what filmmaker doesn&#039;t know, since simplest and the important thing that does not change is how computer operates.(Hard drive, come on!)

So there it is, I guess other things are also there but so far I know computer a bit and brain a whole lot well so that&#039;s how I think. This is a really great movie with a low budget, even as a time-looping story. Maybe the key to understand this is to see it in organic/ physical way, or maybe by profiling director&#039;s FOV and how does it affects the film. Either way is so fun and interesting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were limitless, other strip of loop that were recorded to the ARQ(As showed in the movie) and since obviously the one who came up with the idea is so friendly with programming, this could be a thing. Why do they remember certain loops(till 9) seems to because of Cuz(cousin) touching the ARQ changing the co-factor, but the only thing that is consistent is:<br />
1. Loop<br />
2. Crash on the screen,and files, programs, the drive that contains data<br />
3. Radio that bandits were hearing to; precisely, the radio signal that repeats itself(as they talked about why someone hear this repeating, answer was simple but very good reason since it&#8217;s a movie about time loop)</p>
<p>So we can think that loop would&#8217;ve caused something at least something to the world inside the movie, physically it was the circle and the difference seemed to be:</p>
<p>1. ecosystem inside the circle (the contrast that shows the color difference inside&amp;outside circle, this is important because organisms were also kinda a big key to this movie)<br />
2. memory (it&#8217;s all about the variables of memory in this)<br />
3. Behavior as memory changes</p>
<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned, the problem to this is that first of all data is also physically differing as computer records it, and since memory is very fragile and when big changes occur to you your memory can be always shut off, just like that. But the problem is that memory causes change in behavior, and behavioral changes caused them to record the warning message.</p>
<p>So now we know what&#8217;s consistent and what&#8217;s not.<br />
So far the movie has lots of &#8216;organic&#8217; differences and physical stuff that does not change. Setting those physical stuff as consistent variable, organic differences are the inconsistent variable that we want to verify.</p>
<p>First flaw to this: Hard drives are not physically same, it&#8217;s different<br />
Second: Time speeds up in a linear manner, but their conception doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>This is because it&#8217;s a movie, &#8216;conception&#8217; is something that it&#8217;s hard to adjust or to be shown by film. Also computer is obviously not what filmmaker doesn&#8217;t know, since simplest and the important thing that does not change is how computer operates.(Hard drive, come on!)</p>
<p>So there it is, I guess other things are also there but so far I know computer a bit and brain a whole lot well so that&#8217;s how I think. This is a really great movie with a low budget, even as a time-looping story. Maybe the key to understand this is to see it in organic/ physical way, or maybe by profiling director&#8217;s FOV and how does it affects the film. Either way is so fun and interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Angela		</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2039</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomytrek.com/?p=8058#comment-2039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But if the world outside keeps on progressing couldn&#039;t the war have been over for hundreds of years now? What&#039;s stopping this from happening in the film I don&#039;t feel like it was really discussed so maybe everything that&#039;s happening in the circle will continue forever but the war has been won and the world continues without the two.... and if the world continues without them does that mean the two are stuck in the past or would time snap to all the way in future once they left the circle?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if the world outside keeps on progressing couldn&#8217;t the war have been over for hundreds of years now? What&#8217;s stopping this from happening in the film I don&#8217;t feel like it was really discussed so maybe everything that&#8217;s happening in the circle will continue forever but the war has been won and the world continues without the two&#8230;. and if the world continues without them does that mean the two are stuck in the past or would time snap to all the way in future once they left the circle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pete		</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2022</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomytrek.com/?p=8058#comment-2022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2020&quot;&gt;PS&lt;/a&gt;.

I believe that&#039;s because in Loop 5 Renton clears the formula off the screen to explain the time loop to Hannah for the first time. In later iterations, however, Hannah is already aware of the loop and so Renton does not need to wipe the equations from the screen, and draw the time loop diagram for her.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2020">PS</a>.</p>
<p>I believe that&#8217;s because in Loop 5 Renton clears the formula off the screen to explain the time loop to Hannah for the first time. In later iterations, however, Hannah is already aware of the loop and so Renton does not need to wipe the equations from the screen, and draw the time loop diagram for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PS		</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2020</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 02:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomytrek.com/?p=8058#comment-2020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the laboratory the drawing board with a crack initially has just the time loop explation from Renton to Hannah .
But at the later loops why is there is a formula on the drawing board ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the laboratory the drawing board with a crack initially has just the time loop explation from Renton to Hannah .<br />
But at the later loops why is there is a formula on the drawing board ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daniel		</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2019</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomytrek.com/?p=8058#comment-2019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2011&quot;&gt;Daniel&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;d be one thing if she woke up and we KNEW she remembered, but her just waking up first doesn&#039;t really indicate that? Unless the suddenness of her waking is supposed to be that indicator.
I don&#039;t think that Hannah would have woken up first in some iterations and not others. I think it&#039;s supposed to be significant, but not sure of what. My only thought was that he died for good and isn&#039;t waking up.
And yes, I saw inception, but the spinning top had very clear consequences. We knew what would happen if it fell over. In ARQ we aren&#039;t really clued into what her waking up first would mean.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2011">Daniel</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be one thing if she woke up and we KNEW she remembered, but her just waking up first doesn&#8217;t really indicate that? Unless the suddenness of her waking is supposed to be that indicator.<br />
I don&#8217;t think that Hannah would have woken up first in some iterations and not others. I think it&#8217;s supposed to be significant, but not sure of what. My only thought was that he died for good and isn&#8217;t waking up.<br />
And yes, I saw inception, but the spinning top had very clear consequences. We knew what would happen if it fell over. In ARQ we aren&#8217;t really clued into what her waking up first would mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pete		</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2018</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomytrek.com/?p=8058#comment-2018</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2017&quot;&gt;Kyle&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks! I believe its Father who has the SKY message in his mouth. Renton gave Hannah the SKY prompt word in the previous loop (7) while Sonny was disguised as the electrocuted Cuz on the floor, and now its in Father&#039;s mouth in the next loop. Quite intriguing. Perhaps Sonny placed it there as a means to get a message to Toros, before then shooting himself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2017">Kyle</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks! I believe its Father who has the SKY message in his mouth. Renton gave Hannah the SKY prompt word in the previous loop (7) while Sonny was disguised as the electrocuted Cuz on the floor, and now its in Father&#8217;s mouth in the next loop. Quite intriguing. Perhaps Sonny placed it there as a means to get a message to Toros, before then shooting himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kyle		</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2017</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomytrek.com/?p=8058#comment-2017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why does Cuz have SKY (written on a piece of paper) in loop #8? Wouldn&#039;t seem as though Sonny would need to write the self-destruct code down (he&#039;d just remember), nor so I see why he&#039;d want to destroy it at all. 

Great site! ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does Cuz have SKY (written on a piece of paper) in loop #8? Wouldn&#8217;t seem as though Sonny would need to write the self-destruct code down (he&#8217;d just remember), nor so I see why he&#8217;d want to destroy it at all. </p>
<p>Great site! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pete		</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2016</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomytrek.com/?p=8058#comment-2016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2013&quot;&gt;Katie Robinson&lt;/a&gt;.

That&#039;s a good/tricky question. Maybe Renton misunderstood what the petrified circle represents, and the time loop actually has more than just a localized effect, and that it could also act as a physical barrier. Or alternatively, if he is correct and time inside the boundary is different from that outside, then there must still be a convergence point in which the loop and the outside timeline meet, i.e. when the intruders enter the house for the first time.

If that&#039;s the case, then the Earth&#039;s timeline reality continues as usual unless an outside Toros operative is contacted by phone, in which case a parallel universe may be created. As a result, ARQ may have resulted in an infinite number of parallel universes being created, while those people trapped inside the loop continue to exist within its roughly three and a quarter hour time cycle. Just an idea, although I am sure there are many other interesting possibilities to explain the puzzle..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.astronomytrek.com/arq-2016-explained/#comment-2013">Katie Robinson</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good/tricky question. Maybe Renton misunderstood what the petrified circle represents, and the time loop actually has more than just a localized effect, and that it could also act as a physical barrier. Or alternatively, if he is correct and time inside the boundary is different from that outside, then there must still be a convergence point in which the loop and the outside timeline meet, i.e. when the intruders enter the house for the first time.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case, then the Earth&#8217;s timeline reality continues as usual unless an outside Toros operative is contacted by phone, in which case a parallel universe may be created. As a result, ARQ may have resulted in an infinite number of parallel universes being created, while those people trapped inside the loop continue to exist within its roughly three and a quarter hour time cycle. Just an idea, although I am sure there are many other interesting possibilities to explain the puzzle..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
